Instant Replay: Change We Shouldn't Believe In
Memories can certainly be strange things. In my mind, I not only know that Tom Glavine struck out Lenny Harris with a ball 2 feet off home plate to end the 1998 season, I can see the pitch. I know this happened as much as I know that Carlos Delgado hit two home runs the other night. And I was gonna use this fact as the lede to this little posting I got my arm twisted into making.
So then I head over to baseball-reference.com just to find out what the count was when that pitch was made and I find out that Mike Piazza popped out too second (boooooo!!!!!!) off of Rudy Seanez to end the 1998 season. Guess this makes sense… no reason the 106 win Braves would have let Glavine pitch a complete game heading into the playoffs.
So, anyway, every memory I have before, like, yesterday is now suspect. Fortunately, I can still see clearly into the future.
October 1, 2028
ATLANTA – With the bases loaded, Tom Glavine, Jr. struck out Julio Franco, 70, to send the Braves to the playoffs by one game over the New York Mets. Unfortunately, for the Braves, home plate umpire Bob Davidson broke up the victory celebration to award a game winning base-on-balls to the Mets. Instant replay demonstrated the pitch did not, in fact, just catch the black.
* * * * *
Let there be no doubt that this is where baseball is headed. Sometime in our lives, the same ball tracking graphics that bring "certainty" to tennis line calls will be introduced to fix the errors of home plate umpires.
Instant replay started yesterday only for home run calls. Apparently, it is simply unacceptable that umpires get some miniscule percentage of home run calls wrong. Especially if one of them is on a nationally televised Mets-Yankees game.
Major League Baseball will eventually extend replay to fair-foul line calls (it's only the natural extension of home run calls and the Brewers would've made the playoffs in 2009 if we had this rule in place). From there, plays at the bases, hit-by-pitches, foul tips, and eventually strikes-balls.
Unless MLB can control its Al Gorian inclination to control anything and everything we are heading in this direction. The game will slow down. More importantly, the green grass, wood bat, and beautiful infield that takes your breath away when you get to your seats every Opening Day will be joined by a television/phone system that resembles a microwave.
All to "fix" something that is not, in fact, a problem. Major League umpires do a tremendous job. Over the course of a season – and certainly over the course of a lifetime – the mistakes equal themselves out.
* * * * *
Even if replay does not become an integral part of the game, it still sucks. Sports is entertainment, it's not life or death. Part of the entertainment of sports – even if it's occasionally a kick in the gut – is having the umps blow a call. Life's unfair and, sometimes, so are home runs calls.
Think of the most famous blown home run call of our lifetimes – Jeffrey Maier's catch in right field at Yankee Stadium.
It is possible that if that ball gets overruled and called an out. The Yankees probably don't come back and tie the game and, therefore, don't win it in extra innings. Maybe the O's go on and still win Game 2 and then, up 2-0, they win the series. Seems likely the Yankees still would've won the series, considering they won the series 4-1, but there's no doubt that would dramatically change the way the series played out.
If that happened, not one person would remember Jeffrey Maier today. Nobody would've cared that he played centerfield for the Wesleyan Cardinals. None of us at Williams would have had a blast heckling him at Williams-Wesleyan baseball games. All a pretty good time.
There's nothing wrong with a blown call. It creates a villain. It adds to the drama (read: entertainment value) of sports. And, crucially, they are extremely few and far between.
No doubt I'm standing athwart history yelling "Stop!" here, but for me instant replay is schoolmarmish.
- Nails





3 Comments:
God forbid they get the call right. That'd be a friggin' disaster.
Open Bar: Did you read the entire post?
"There's nothing wrong with a blown call. It creates a villain. It adds to the drama (read: entertainment value) of sports. And, crucially, they are extremely few and far between."
I don't want to put words in Nails' mouth, but the point he seems to be making is that blown calls are part of the game, and part of the history of the game. If you want every "friggin'" call right (because god forbid it'd be a disaster if they didn't get them all correct), why stop at home run calls? Are you arguing for instant replay on all questionable calls?
Incidentally, I'm not saying I agree with everything Nails said -- I actually think instant replay, if applied correctly (i.e., unobtrusively), is a good thing.
I doubt baseball would ever get to the point where balls and strikes are decided through instant replay for the same reason the NBA could never institute instant replay to get foul calls correct. Those things are inherently subjective: some umps have a high zone or a low zone or give a little more on the outside corner against righty batters; sometimes you give a title to the Miami Heat. Those things will not change.
Whether a ball went over a fence or a yellow line, or was on one side of a white line or another---these things are not subjective. Those calls should be gotten right, whether you think it takes away from the "human element" of the game or not. To err is human, but to err on objective calls that can greatly effect the outcome of a game when the technology is in place to eliminate those errors is folly.
And Jeffrey Maier can eat a bag of d***s.
Post a Comment
<< Home