New York Skyline
Yankees Messing up Promote the Curse Mets Playing Well
[ Return to Home Page ]

Wednesday, January 09, 2008

"And I think it's gonna be a long, long time ..."

The headlines were too kind, if anything, and barely reflective of the coverage inside. "Clemens Tries to Work Out of a Jam" indeed. Pop quiz, hotshots. You know you're in trouble when the New York Times:

A) Devotes the top 65 percent of its sports page to your press conference when the other major event of the previous day was, oh, I don't know ... college football's national championship game

B) Calls in a body language expert to call you guilty, the sort of move favored by Bill O'Reilly

C) Has its senior sports columnist call you a liar

D) Has its media columnist call the "60 Minutes" interview in which you defend yourself some weak sauce

E) All of the above

Now, the Yankee fans in the building will probably protest that there was no "F) Everything is fine, nothing to see" option, and good for them. In for a penny, in for a pound, and if you were willing to believe in the Legend of the Fat Traitor Hick way back when, no use throwing in the towel now. Gotta see this one through to the bitter, bulky end.

But everyone else should have chosen option Echo. Not for nothing, but Clemens probably committed career suicide up there at the podium Monday, strutting and huffing like a puffed-up rooster. The man was angry, to be sure, but it was hard to tell at what. The allegations? The media coverage? His water bottle? Very difficult to say.

What was clear is that a consensus has emerged. The new Conventional Wisdom can more or less be summed up in two points.

Point 1 -- He's guilty as shit

Point 2 -- He's a lying, backstabbing weasel

Now, the former is certainly a consequence of the widespread acceptance of the latter. Nothing factually new came out of the "60 Minutes" interview with Mike Wallace; the big draw was seeing Roger issue his denials live on tape, to an at least somewhat tough interviewer, with the lights on and the cameras rolling and all that. The evidence against him hasn't changed one bit. It's still all riding on the word of Brian McNamee, the former trainer who cut a deal with the Federales. No new test results or affadavits popped up since the Mitchell Report came out.

Rather it was Clemens' truly amazing disingenuity and blithe arrogance which turned even former supporters against him in the interim. Clemens attacked the allegations in the report head on, issuing a flat denial and moving on from there. He pulled out the bully moves -- statments of personal affront and aggrievery, threats of lawsuits, references to his awards and honors.

Then, he taped the interview with Wallace, where he claimed to be completely unaware of Andy Pettitte's HGH situation. As many folks have pointed out, Pettitte is the definition of a follower; he might well be described as a Clemens discipline. It runs counter to everything we know about the longtime teammates' relationship to think the pathetically devout Pettitte would have used any type of PED without the tacit or explicit approval of his buddy.

Clemens also made points with no connection to the world that you, I, and Angel Pagan live in. "If he's doing that to me, I should have a third ear coming out of my forehead," he argued, regarding the alleged steroid injections. "I should be pulling tractors with my teeth." Which would be plausible, except for the fact that dozens of current and former players have admitted to taking 'roids, and it's taken for granted that none of them have any extra appendages, organs, or membranes to speak of. Certainly, we haven't caught Guillermo Mota roping steers with his jaw (yet). I mean, what on Earth is the Rocket talking about? Even the most strident denouncers of the juice aren't clamining its side effects are comparable with those of, say, The Ooze.

Let's also recall the sliming of McNamee, who was of course under tremendous pressure by the government agents (tossing around the threat of jail, that is) to tell only the truth. In the "60 Minutes" piece, Wallace tossed up a softball to the Rocket along the lines of, "Why do you think [McNamee] would tell the investigators what he did?" Clemens responded with indignation. "To stay out of jail!" was basically his response.

This, needless to say, only makes sense if you think the government had it out for Clemens, and wanted to compel McNamee's testimony in that regard. There's no evidence of this, and indeed as McNamee was already naming plenty of notable names and scads of Yankees, there can't have been an issue as to volume. As to personal motivation, we need only listen to the taped telephone conversation between the two to hear how the outing personally affected McNamee. The voice is that of a sorrowful, apologetic, almost syncophantic man.

The voice of a liar? Literally nothing would lead you to such a conclusion.

Meaning, of course, Clemens' leaking of the tape wound up being a total backfire, as McNamee clearly never admits to saying anything false and Clemens' insinuations to the contrary rang hollow. It was also a complete backstab, which never goes over well.

Probably most damaging, in the end, was his admissions to B-12 and lidocaine injections, followed by his cavalier disclosure that he "was eating Vioxx like it was Skittles." First of all, what? Not even Brett Favre would be down with that. Second of all, you might have saved some money by going generic. But most importantly, you simply can't concede all those points -- essentially, that you're addicted to non-criminal performance enhancers and painkillers -- and then pretend it's a Stretch Armstrong for someone to think you might have taken an illegal PED. People can read between the lines just fine. People can sense context. The context of a painkiller junkie getting on his high horse about drugs is known most commonly as "horseshit."

Which feeds back into Point 1. No one has ever come out and said "I injected Mark McGwire with steroids" (well, unless you count Jose Canseco as a human, and few of us do), but look at him polling under 25 percent in the recent HOF vote. Sammy Sosa was on the Grimsley Affadavit, but even before, with his 600 home runs and zero positive drug scans, nobody thinks he's got a shot at the Hall any time soon. Why? They assume he's guilty. Q.E.D.

Leaving us ... where? With a likely retirement, and a Hall of Fame environment positively poisonous for those suspected of PED use, and an increasingly hostile fan environment. Rocket Fuel t-shirt sales down? Only the beginning. Say goodbye to them T-Mobile ads and MLB.com promos and cutsey little appearances at Koby Clemens' minor-league games. I'm thinking Bonds-level boos, Palmeiro-style derision, Sosa-level irrelevance. Arguably the greatest pitcher of all time, certainly the best since Walter Johnson was on the hill, and he's going to end up more Ben Johson than Carl Lewis. It would be sad if he weren't so despicable. Quite a hypothetical, I know.

It would of course be a stretch to say I'm upset at any of this. Some people just have it coming, and Roger Clemens had it coming more than most.

4 Comments:

Blogger A Friend of Mr. Glass' said...

This was a truly excellent post -- nice job, Ched.

And thanks for mentioning the sheer absurdity of that "third ear" comment. You're exactly right. The only possible response to that gem was "what planet is this guy living on?"

1:46 PM  
Anonymous The Coop said...

I hate Roider Clemens. I do. After seeing his fat ugly face on your posting Ched, my reaction was reminiscent of John Belushi's reaction to seeing Kent Dorfman on the screen in Animal House.

1:52 PM  
Blogger Sara said...

The best part about the taped conversation is Mcnamee saying "What do you want me to do?" That pretty much seals it for me, McNamee could come out in a month and say "I was lying, I hate Clemens and wanted him to get in trouble." and we'd just realize Clemens is paying him to go to jail.

2:41 PM  
Anonymous Hound said...

I can't disagree with anything posted in the original post, or in the comments. Clemens' story isn't working, and isn't likely to. BUT, having spent a lot of time this weekend talking Mitchell Report with a few cronies, I am starting to feel that the focus on the players is misguided. The real villains of this piece are the Commish, the leadership of the Players Union, and the GM's offices across the sport who knew perfectly well what was going on, and did exactly zero to stop it. Look at the memo from the Dodgers (I think it was) re LoDuca that is quoted in the M. Report as an example of the awareness. So, while all of this is uncomfortable for baseball, I have a feeling that big Bud S wakes up every day saying to himself, "This could be a lot worse; they could be all over me. Glad it's Clemens taking the heat." In fact, baseball's leadership completely failed to lead on this; they let an obvious cancer develop when effective leadership might have stamped it out.

Yeah, the Clemens thing is fun in a lot of ways, but it's also a great big sideshow that is calculated to obscure the real wrongdoing by the people who were in a position -- in fact, whose job it was -- to stop this catastrophe before it happened.

You can call me a Clemens apologist if you want. If so you're missing my point. The players who cheated are culpable but it's not in the least bit surprising that given the oppty, some will cheat. But why they were given that opportunity is the bigger question.

9:51 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Yankees 2000: Promote the Curse is an independent sports website that is not affiliated with any other news outlet. Yankees 2000 is in no way affiliated with the New York Yankees, the New York Mets, the National League, the American League, Major League Baseball, or any other professional sports franchise.
All images in the website header are copyrighted by MLB.com, CNN.com, or MSNBC.com.