[ Return to Home Page ]

Wednesday, May 31, 2006

Coming to Terms with Scott Kazmir

So who else saw the sports section in the New York Times today? Splashed across the top of the page was an article about a Mets prospect turned Major Leaguer, a prospect so highly regarded that he forced his way to the Majors before being legally allowed to purchase alcohol.

Lastings Milledge? On the day he debuted? Nah... too obvious.

Scott Kazmir? Ahh, there's the ticket!

As I gazed bleary-eyed at the lead article of the NYT sports section this morning (click the title above to read), I almost thought my buddy Nails had taken over as Sports Editor of the New York Times.

For those not personally familiar with Nails, he's basically your classic pissed off Mets fan, except that instead of being a Democrat, he's a frothing conservative.

More important than his political inclinations, however, is that he's a former employee of the Mets. In his one summer at Mets, Inc., Nails studied the reports from the Mets' minor league system, most likely because the product on display at Shea Stadium, in the summer of 2003, was simply too depressing.

All of us hardcore Mets fans had heard about Scott Kazmir by then. We'd been aware that the Mets had stolen the jewel of the pitching crop in that year's draft with the 15th overall pick in the draft, where Kazmir had fallen due to fears that his agent, Scott Boras, would seek undue compensation for his client's services.

But it wasn't until Nails started his summer at Shea that I began receiving my weekly e-mails about Kazmir's latest performances, complete with Nails' amateur scouting reports indicating that Kazmir had a plus-plus fastball, plus makeup, plus-plus muffin ass, etc., etc., etc.

Zoom forward to the present day and Nails no longer sends his scouting reports, but in the e-mails he sends every 5th day, he makes certain that none of the five or six Mets fans on his listserve ever escape into the ignorance is bliss camp vis-a-vis Scott Kazmir.

Reading the article, which was written by actual NYT Sports Editor Lee Jenkins and which quickly shot up to the No. 2 most e-mailed sports story on the Times' website (and will doubtless take over the top spot later in the day), you come to understand that perhaps it wasn't conceived as a cruel joke to be played on Mets fans, nor was it meant to rain on the Mets' Milledge parade.

Instead, the article casts the Kazmir trade as the monsoon before the blossoming Mets careers of Pedro Martinez, Carlos Beltran, Carlos Delgado, who were acquired, "in part," Jenkins writes, "because [the Mets] needed to restore credibility and regain fan confidence that had noticeably eroded after the Kazmir trade."

I'm not sure that anything can quite make up for the Kazmir trade. As I wrote to the Hound in an e-mail earlier today:

"At some point you've gotta realize that nothing is ever going to make you feel better about the trade. It was so ill-conceived on so many levels that even any silver lining will inevitably be obscured.

"However, if, 5 years from now, Lastings Milledge and Mike Pelfrey (the former of whom I'm convinced would have been traded at last year's deadline if not for the Kazmir deal, and not just because of this article) are established stars on the Mets, then perhaps a wrong would have helped make a right.

"If you've gotta think about the Kazmir trade, try and think of it that way."

That's a palliative cliche, sure, but that's really as good as you can do.

Take last night as an example. You can either look at it throught he prism of Alay Soler getting lit up and think, "If only Scott Kazmir was here," or you can look at it through the prism and think, "Well, if we had to trade Scott Kazmir to save Lastings Milledge, so be it."

It's fool's gold on some level, because really there's no reason that you shouldn't have them both, but try and remind yourself that a small part of the Scott Kazmir trade factored into the Lastings Milledge era, as we hope to call it some day.

As Lee observes, without the Kazmir trade, the Mets might well have traded Milledge for Manny Ramirez at the trade deadline last year. Now, that's a trade a lot of you would have been willing to make, but I'm willing to bet that 5 years from now Milledge looks a lot better than Manny does.

And last night at least, it looked like Milledge belonged.

As he swung his bat ferociously before the pitcher got set, he couldn't help but remind you of Gary Sheffield.

As he swung his bat ferociously through each hack at the ball, again he couldn't help but remind you of Sheffield.

As his massive wooden cross bobbed from side to side, he couldn't help but remind you of the man upstairs.

And as his major league career progresses, and as he hopefully becomes a premier player in the league, let his star remind you of the Kazmir trade, and let it remind you that sometimes a wrong can help make a right.

As a Mets fan watching the career of Scott Kazmir unfold, that's really the best you can do.

At least until free agency, at which point I insist that we break the bank to bring Kid K home.

- A.F.O.M.G.

11 Comments:

Anonymous Lister said...

No disrespect to SM, but PEDRO HAS TO BURY ERIC BYRNES IN THE DIRT TONIGHT. The guy is diving all over the plate, pulling balls down and off the plate, and making us look like a bunch of jerks in our own backyard. This is unacceptable, especially when you consider the way he is lighting us up. Retire Counsell and then bring it up and in on Byrnes until he gets the point. Hit the bum. Jesus this is ridiculous. How did Soler not challenge the guy once at the fists (or face)? Unbelievable...

12:30 PM  
Blogger Happy Will said...

Here's the irony: clearly the affinity for prospects such as Milledge and Kazmir is borne out of the idea that it's more fun to root for your players from the minors because you've "earned" their success more than when the Mets import a higher priced free agent because they are a "have" in a world of baseball "have-nots."

Yet as AFOMG touched on during his post, the only reason the Mets got Kazmir in the first place was because they could afford him. If the baseball draft were a meritocracy that we want to delude ourselves into believing, the Mets never would have tasted the fruits of the Kazmir nectar. So yes, we dwell on this as a missed opportunity, but it was also a missed opportunity to let Vlad sign with the Angels because we low-balled him.

Essentially we should stop treating Kazmir like he was some special property whose success we deserved, we got him because we could afford him and yes, we've squandered that opportunity, but for the very reason we were able to get him in the first place, namely financial advantages, we will have opportunities at future great pitchers and the current regime--perhaps a direct by-product of the ill-fated trade has proven that they know how to spend the money of Mets teams of the past, but can do so to effectively build a winner and position the Mets as perhaps the best current team and best built team in baseball.

Maybe instead of thinking that Kazmir has cursed us, we realize that it awoken us to our position of financial strength and necessity to pair that advantage with sound decision making.

We're at the start of what looks like it might be the most logical, optimistic and best era in Mets history and while it's easy to look at Kazmir and think what might have been, it's just as easy to face facts, realize we got him only because we could afford him, that such a situation will arise countless times in the future and we now have an organization we can trust and is already set up to dominate the NL for the next 8-10 years.

Don't worry, be happy.

Happy Will

12:40 PM  
Anonymous Lister said...

Hit Eric Byrnes In The Mouth!!!!!!!!!!!

12:57 PM  
Anonymous Nails said...

I will be responding with a lengthy post on Friday after I see Kazmir pitch in Baltimore tomorrow afternoon.

I think Mets fans should still care about Kazmir and will elucidate my reasons.

That said, I think if you are a baseball fan then you really should follow his career. I'd say the same thing about David Wright to a non-Mets fans. Baseball is art and in Kazmir and Wright you have the opportunity to watch to amazing artistic careers develop. I think it's silly to deprive yourself of that just because it brings up the painful memory that we should have both Michaelangelo and Picasso together on the same team.

1:00 PM  
Anonymous Nails said...

I also really resent being labeled "a classic pissed off Mets fan." If there's anybody that gets more joy out of the Mets than I, I'd be surprised. And it's certainly not obnoxious Will "I'm a Mets fan. Oops, I'm a Red Sox fan. Oops, I'm a Mets fan" Bressman.

I have not been pissed off all season about the Mets, nor do I think I was pissed off last season. I have been "pissed off" for many years before that because the team constantly ignored the necessity of building a dynasty instead focusing on building a winner "for this year" by harnassing its hopes on guys like Mo Vaughn just because stupid Jeff Wilpon visited Mo Vaughn over the winter and was impressed that he was eating cottage cheese (true story) or traded a young talent because Al Leiter didn't like the fact that he put Eminem on the clubhouse stereo (true story).

1:09 PM  
Blogger Happy Will said...

Two things:

1) Nails to complete your renaissance/Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles analogy, you should have called Kazmir the Raphael to David Wright's Da Vinci. The Picasso reference was a little anachronistic.

2) I made a miskate with the Red Sox incident, but can we ever let bygones be bygones? I'm a Mets fan, and other than a two week hiatus, I always have been and always will be. Being a Mets fan isn't a competition and I don't get why people feel the need to prove that they're "Better fans" than others. Who cares? If you like the Mets and aren't a bandwagon fan (and truth be told, I don't even really mind bandwagon fans), what's the difference?

1:28 PM  
Anonymous Big Maciej said...

Eric Byrnes is the best thing going in the Majors right now. As Sippy said, the dude is straight-up the most likable guy I've ever met.

Even the Queens/Long Island Bobbies at Mets games have to love this aryan.

2:08 PM  
Anonymous A Friend of Mr. Glass' said...

Happy Will -- the point you make in your first post is well taken.

Nails -- No offense intended with the "pissed off Mets fan" comment. I'm sure you haven't been pissed off this season, but you did boycott Mets home games all last year on account of the Kazmir trade, so I have to argue with the contention that you were not pissed off last year. Either way, I did not mean to suggest that you don't derive as much (or more) joy out of the Mets as anyone I know.

That all said, I'll leave you with an observation from A Friend of Mrs. Glass', which I received just now: "All I can say to the matter is that it sounds like nails might not have been pissed off last year or this year, but today, today he sounds a little pissed off."

2:51 PM  
Anonymous Nails said...

Ha. Yeah, actually I was aiming for a little irony in the sounding particularly pissed off in my "I'm not pissed off" post. That and I also find it incredibly boring when people lecture me on how we're supposed to "move on."

Whatever. It's a new day; Heritage killed cato on the softball field last night; mets won a gem, and in 12 hours I'll be in Baltimore watching Kid K pitch.

6:41 AM  
Anonymous Lister said...

Lasting's Throw: http://mlb.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/article.jsp?ymd=20060601&content_id=1482580&vkey=news_mlb&fext=.jsp&c_id=mlb

THANK YOU, NEW YORK METROPOLITANS!
and thanks for the ride home bart

9:57 AM  
Anonymous Ms. SE said...

I must say: I do love the banter between Nails and AFOMG. Keep it up!

11:27 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Mets Extra is an independent sports website that is not affiliated with any other news outlet. Mets Extra (including its predecessor, Yankees 2000: Promote the Curse) is not affiliated in any way with the New York Mets, the New York Yankees, WFAN Sports Radio 66 ("The FAN"), Major League Baseball, the National League, the American League, or any other professional sports franchise or entity.